Pages

About the author

Sarah------------

Hello and welcome! My mission is to find intriguing facts and tell it like it is. I try to do this daily, although this is challenging sometimes. I look for interesting stories that change the way you look at the world.

--------------------

To follow by email:

Translate

Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Get yer binoculars, folks


Image (Source 3).












Jane Goodall's study of chimpanzees in Tanzania is the longest study of any wild animal group, spanning 45 years (Source 1).


(Source 2)


Bibliography
1.  "30 Years of National Geographic Specials" DVD,  "Jane Goodall: My Life with the Chimpanzees: 1990" scene.  NGT, Inc., 2003.  ISBN: 0-7922-9994-9.


2. "Jane & Flint" image by photographer Hugo van Lawick, National Geographic Society.  From article, "The Jane Goodall Institute Of Canada Marks The 50th Anniversary Of Dr. Jane Goodall's Research" by Social Media Release, posted 2010.  WWW: http://smr.newswire.ca/en/jane-goodall-institute-of-canada/jane-goodall-institute-50th-anniversary.


3. "Peter Scott: the 'patron saint of conservation'." image in article "My hero: Peter Scott" by Louisa Young, 2011. Photograph copyright: Hulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis.  WWW: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/dec/30/my-hero-peter-scott-louisa-young.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Conchshell 3

--> (Sources 9 and 6)

Actually it's called Conshelf III, for Continental Shelf Station 3. It was an undersea exploration mission by Jacques Cousteau and his team that took place in 1965.  



In it, 6 men were sent down to the sea floor at a record depth of 328 feet/100 meters in a submarine, a round "underwater habitat" to live there for 3 weeks for the first time ever (Source 1).  They took samples and explored the surrounding area, and were studied to see how the effects of pressure and the mix of helium and oxygen they breathed would effect them.



The interior of the Conshelf II, the mission before Conshelf III (Source 7).

The helium-oxygen mix was used so that the oceanauts could still absorb oxygen in the extreme pressure.  In addition, it is better than a nitrogen-oxygen mix because nitrogen can have a narcotic effect when diving (Source 11).  


It made the men's voices high and chipmunky, and "it took several days for them to understand each other's squeaky falsetto." This is because sound travels faster in a helium-oxygen blend, a.k.a. heliox, than in normal air (Source 10).  The helium also had the effect of decreased appetite, and water wouldn't boil for coffee, and cigarettes wouldn't stay lit because helium diffuses heat (Source 1).



View of the Conshelf III from the outside (Source 8).

I love the idea of 6 men stuck together for 3 weeks, way down on the bottom of the oceean, trying to communicate in high squeaky French, complaining that their cigarettes wouldn't stay lit.









Family portrait of Jacques Cousteau, son Philippe, and son Jean-Michel, left to right (Source 4).








Another family portrait, this time of Jean-Michel Cousteau and son Fabien, and daughter Celine (Source 5).




Oceanaut Philip Cousteau's impression of the dark ocean deep, written in his diary:


"As soon as I have cleared the sphere, I am struck by the absence of the surface.  A total absence - felt like a chill.  Darkness covers us like a shroud, my searchlight beam disappears in all directions, except on the flat and gray bottom.  I must find ways to fight the cold, and forget my fright." (Source 1)


     Image of Jacques Cousteau (Source 3).

Cousteau Society's description of Conshelf III:


"In 1962, Conshelf I was set up off Marseilles at ten meters depth. [...] In 1965, near Nice, France, the ultimate stage, Conshelf III, was born. One hundred meters below the surface, a building housed six oceanauts who would live together for three weeks. They would go out each day to work on a mockup oil well, an exercise to evaluate human capabilities.


"Conshelf proved that human beings can live under the sea for long periods of time but that, even though they have the physical and psychological capabilities, humans are not made to exist in a world without sun. Nevertheless, these experiments gave rise to the training astronauts undergo today before leaving for a world of billions of suns: Space. Here, too, Cousteau was a precursor." (Source 2)

"Yellow Submarine" by the Beatles music video HD (Source 12).


Bibliography
1. "30 Years of National Geographic Specials" DVD, "The World of Jacques-Yves Cousteau: 1966" scene.  NGT, Inc., 2003.  ISBN: 0-7922-9994-9.


2.  "Conshelf I, II & III" webpage.  Cousteau Society, 2012.  WWW: http://www.cousteau.org/technology/conshelf.


3. "Jacques Cousteau" image by rook.  Yay Images, 2012.  WWW: http://yaymicro.com/stock-image/jacques-cousteau/2511821.


4. "Jacques Cousteau and Sons" image from blog post "Jacques-Yves Cousteau the Greatest Explorer [Part 4 or 4], posted by blog author Jake@RolexMagazine.com, 1998.  Blogger, 2012.  WWW: http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/jacques-yves-cousteau-greatest-explorer.html.


5. "Jean-Michel Cousteau" image from blog post "Jacques-Yves Cousteau the Greatest Explorer [Part 4 or 4], posted by blog author Jake@RolexMagazine.com, 1998.  Blogger, 2012.  WWW: http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/jacques-yves-cousteau-greatest-explorer.html.


6.  "Living and Working in the Sea" image of hardcover book published 1995, from Amazon listing.  WWW: http://www.amazon.com/Living-Working-Sea-James-Miller/dp/1886699011.


7. "Conshelf II Chess" image from blog post "Jacques-Yves Cousteau the Greatest Explorer [Part 4 or 4], posted by blog author Jake@RolexMagazine.com, 1998.  Blogger, 2012.  WWW: http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/jacques-yves-cousteau-greatest-explorer.html.


8. "Conshelf III' image from blog post "Jacques-Yves Cousteau the Greatest Explorer [Part 4 or 4], posted by blog author Jake@RolexMagazine.com, 1998.  Blogger, 2012.  WWW: http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/jacques-yves-cousteau-greatest-explorer.html.


9. "Albert Falco Silent World" image from blog post "Jacques-Yves Cousteau the Greatest Explorer [Part 4 or 4], posted by blog author Jake@RolexMagazine.com, 1998.  Blogger, 2012.  WWW: http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/jacques-yves-cousteau-greatest-explorer.html.


10. "Heliox" Wikipedia article, 2012.  WWW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliox.


11. "Scuba Diving Safety: Know Your Breathing Gasses" webpage by World Diving Review, 2012. WWW: http://www.worlddivingreview.com/scuba-diving-safety-know-your-breathing-gases.


12.  "The Beatles - Yellow Submarine [HD]" YouTube video posted by HDBeatles, 2010.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wrs5DjHNUOE.

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Bigger is... more efficient!

                                                    <-- (Source 15)
...at least for an animal with a large body mass, because it has a more efficient use of food-energy than smaller animals.


Why do large animals need less food per gram of body mass?  Why do they use energy more efficiently when the animal is large, than when it is small?  This question deals with "universal scaling laws" (Source 7).
The Kleiber Law, illustrated in the chart above, says "Larger animals have relatively slower metabolisms than small ones. A mouse must eat about a third of its body mass every day not to starve whereas a human can survive on only 2%." (Source 13).

Why? Wherefore? Pourquoi? Warum?¿Por qué?

One possible answer is that the larger animal has a more complex and advanced, and therefore more efficient circulatory system, etc., perhaps because cells can only be so small?  Therefore they can survive on less because their large size allows for their internal workings to become richly branched, like a thick system of roots, whereas the mouse only has a few strands here and there, and so must eat more to get the energy it needs.

This could also be a reason why larger animals are known to live longer, like Galapagos tortoises, or large mammals like ourselves, whereas little hamsters can only expect 1-2 years (RIP Betty, beloved Mesocricetus auratus coconut-dweller! [Appendix A]).


Example of fractals (Source 6).

Quote from "Fractals" program by Nova.  This section I transcribed is about how these scientists figured out why the bigger animals were more efficient, somewhat with the help of the new way of looking at organic growth mathematically, through the use of fractals. 

The fractal idea is very similar to the Fibonacci sequence idea, and how it relates to nature, so I think it's odd this program didn't mention that...  For instance, they both can predict curves and organic growth patterns, like in a pineapple, or a seashell's spiral, but the Fibonacci idea definitely stays within the realms of the mathematical and geometric, while the fractal geometry is branching out into curves and branches and rugged teeth that are not used in high school geometry.  

And now, a selection of the transcript from this episode (Source 1):


"Narrator: It may take years before fractals can help doctor predict cancer, but they are already offering clues to one of biology's more tantalizing mysteries. An elephant, for example, is 200,000 times heavier than a mouse, but uses only about 100,000 times more energy, in the form of calories it consumes.

Geoffrey West, Santa Fe Institute: The bigger you are, you actually need less energy per gram of tissue to stay alive.  That is an amazing fact!

Narrator: And even more amazing is the fact that this relationship between the mass and energy use of any living thing, is governed by a strict mathematical formula [Image of E = M^3/4].

James Brown, University of New Mexico: So far as we know, that law is universal, or almost universal, across all of life.  So it operates from the tiniest bacteria, to whales and sequoia trees.

Narrator: But even though this law had been discovered back in the 1930s, no one had been able to explain it.

James Brown:  We had this idea that it probably had something to do with how resources are distributed within the bodies of organisms as they varied in size.

Geoffrey West: We took this big leap, and said: all of life, in some way, is sustained by these underlying networks that are transporting oxygen, resources, metabolites, that are feeding cells.  Circulatory systems, and respiratory systems, and renal systems, and neural systems.  It was obvious that fractals were staring us in the face.

Narrator:  If all these biological networks are fractal, it means they obey some simple, mathematical rules, which can lead to new insights into how they work.

James Brown:  If you think about it for a minute, it would be incredibly inefficient to have a set of blueprints for every single stage of increasing size.  But if you have a fractal code - a code that says when to branch, as you get bigger and bigger, then a very simple genetic code can produce what looks like a complicated organism.

Brian Enquist, University of Arizona:  Evolution by natural selection has hit upon a design that appears to give the most bang for the buck.

Narrator:  In 1997, West, Brown and Enquist announced their controversial theory: that fractals hold the key to the mysterious relationship between mass and energy use in animals.  Now they are putting their theory to a bold new test: an experiment to help determine if the fractal structure of a single tree can predict how an entire rain forest works.

[...] [Conclusion:]


Narrator: For generations, scientists believed that the wildness of nature could not be defined by mathematics.  But fractal geometry is leading to a whole new understanding, revealing an underlying order governed by simple mathematical rules.
Fern as an example of fractal structure (Source 8).

Geoffrey West:  What I thought of in my hikes through forests, is that you know it's just a bunch of trees of different sizes, big ones here, small ones there, looking like it's sort of some odd tree chaotic mess - actually has an extraordinary structure.

Narrator: --A structure that can be mapped out and measured using fractal geometry.

Brian Enquist: What's absolutely amazing is that you can translate what you see in the natural world into the language of mathematics, and I can't think of anything more beautiful than that.(Source 1, Time:  42:10- 52:06)
   Example of the fractal structure (Source 2)

So what is a fractal?  

       It's an irregularly shaped way that nature has of increasing its size.  An example is a tree - how as it branches out more and more it forms V's that are all basically the same pattern, but in different sizes.  This repetition is called a self-similar pattern (Source 9).  This idea was a breakthrough in science and mathematics because it shows that irregular growth patterns, as are the norm in nature, can be quantified, measured, predicted, and used for better technology.

For instance, the theory of fractals was used to come up with the idea to make cell phone antennae in a fractal design.  They found this not only picked up the signal better, but allowed it to pick up signals on multiple frequencies, allowing for multiple functions in one cell phone, without having to have dozens of different antennae sticking out of it.                           
Internal fractal-design cell phone antenna (Source 11).                Closer view of the design (Source 12).


Another interpretation of how the same shapes are repeated smaller and smaller ad infinitum, like Russian nesting dolls (Source 3).

(Source 10)




Video showing how the fractal smaller and smaller reproduction could potentially go on forever (Source 14).

Bibliography
1. "Fractals: Hunting the Hidden Dimension," NOVA, PBS TV program, aired 2008.  Viewed by DVD.  ISBN: 978-1-59375-852-3.
---------For more info on this program:
   You can find the complete transcript for, and other stuff related to this video at                      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/hunting-hidden-dimension.html, which by the way I didn't realize until after I transcribed all the above by hand, lol.

2.  Image 15, photo credit: Courtesy Art Matrix. From webpage related to NOVA PBS TV program, "Fractals: Hunting the Hidden Dimension."  WWW: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/mandelbrot-fractal.html.

3. Image 12, photo credit: Courtesy Art Matrix.  From webpage related to NOVA PBS TV program, "Fractals: Hunting the Hidden Dimension."  WWW: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/mandelbrot-fractal.html.

4. Image from "Friday Fluff," webpage post.  WWW: http://www.seekingelevation.com/2012/01/friday-fluff_27.html.

5.  Image from "How to Tell if my Teddy Bear Hamster is Pregnant," eHow article by Susan Grindstaff.  WWW: http://www.ehow.com/how_6374473_tell-teddy-bear-hamster-pregnant.html.

6. "Fractals everywhere" photograph by Hintersul, posted 2012.  WWW: http://hintursul.deviantart.com/art/Fractals-everywhere-288333753.

7. "Geoffrey West: Bio" webpage by Geoffrey West (I assume), 2012.  Santa Fe Institute faculty profile.  WWW: http://www.santafe.edu/about/people/profile/Geoffrey%20West.

8. Image from Minds, Brains & Catalysis:
A theory of cognition grounded in metabolism by Christopher J. Davia.  Chapter 10: "Scale invariance in biology," webpage.  Carnegie Mellon's Psychology Department, 2011.  WWW: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~davia/mbc/10start.html.

9. "Fractal" Wikipedia article, 2012.  WWW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal.

10. "Fractals: Hunting the Hidden Dimension" blog post by paul_mic, 2010.  WWW: http://monkeybuddha.blogspot.com/2010/12/fractals-hunting-hidden-dimension.html.

11. Image from "Fractal antenna constructions" webpage by ScienceProg.com: Electronics, 2007.  WWW: http://www.scienceprog.com/fractal-antenna-constructions/.

12. "Cell Phone Antenna or a Moth-Eaten Carpet?" image from "The Geometry of Nature" webpage.  WWW: http://www.mathgoody.com/4-4-Fractals/Fractals.html.

13. Image and text from "The Kleiber Law" blog post by ThePEG: the Equation of the Month blog, run by the Theoretical Population Ecology and Evolution GroupBiology Dept.Lund University, posted 2012.  WWW: http://equation-of-the-month.blogspot.com/2012_06_01_archive.html.

14. "Fractal Zoom Mandelbrot Corner" YouTube video uploaded by gooozz, 2006.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_GBwuYuOOs.

15. "Elephant and Mouse Friends" image from Puddle Jumpin' Cards by Sunny Rickards.  WWW: http://puddlejumpincards.bigcartel.com/product/elephant-and-mouse-friends.

Appendix A
She kind of looked like this (Source 5)!
Her coconut house kind of looked like that-ish (Source 4).  Yes, this is relevant to this topic because I'm still alive and she's dead.  See? - smaller animals die more quickly..... (pause)....Waaaaaahhhhhhhh  :'S

....Too cute!  Must abort!

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Those enigmatic electrons --

--what'll they do next?


In the double slit experiment, scientists found that when you shoot electrons through two slits, they act like waves.  But when you place a camera to observe those electrons firing through the slits, they act like matter.

This shows that when electrons are being observed, it changes how they act.  It also shows that subatomic particles have the ability to change how they act, that there are many possibilities for where they are and how they're acting, despite the fact that all matter in the universe, even the tiny tiny unexplored kind, had traditionally been considered by science to be predictable and stable.                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                                        (Image: Source 3)
comme ça:

Video explaining the double slit experiment (Source 1).


 The results of this experiment still baffle scientists and are not completely explained.  Theories about why these sub-atomic particles act the way they do leads you to....

the Realm of Quantum Physics
(wooooooooo)

Quantum physics (the physics of subatomic particles, specifically trying to figure out why they act in unexpected, unexplained ways, like in the double slit experiment) is one of the most interesting fields in science today.  When people talk about it, it seems they're leading to existentialist or Buddhist conclusions, like that reality is not real, you create reality in your head, thereby your thoughts are very powerful.

This can be baffling and hard to come to terms with on a daily basis, but also empowering because it gives each individual unlimited power and responsibility to change her or his destiny and outlook, and invites us to take control of our reality because it's strongly affected by our own thoughts, feelings, habits, and attitudes.

Another video about quantum physics, trying to explain it (Source 2).

Bibliography


1. "The Observer in Physics Double Slit Experiment and Example in Nature" YouTube video, uploaded by covellz, 2010.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu57B1v0SzI.

2. "Quantum Physics Explained, Simply - Robert Anton Wilson" YouTube video, uploaded by UKInfoWarrior, 2009.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEl-fTtP2tw.


3. "Stuart Kauffman - Information Needs Quantum Indeterminacy" image from blog post by William Harryman, 2011. WWW: http://integral-options.blogspot.com/2011/03/stuart-kauffman-information-needs.html.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Hummingbirds...

...can eat twelve times their body weight in nectar in a day. (Source 1)


The ruby-throated hummingbird, native to eastern
North America and Central America (Source 4).


Maybe they eat so much because of the high metabolic rate they have, which is necessary for the large amount of energy they spend to hover, since hummingbirds flap their wings 12-80 times/second, depending on the species.


More on their eating habits:

"Like the similar nectar-feeding sunbirds and unlike other birds, hummingbirds drink by using protrusible grooved or trough-like tongues.[5] Hummingbirds do not spend all day flying, as the energy cost would be prohibitive; the majority of their activity consists simply of sitting or perching. Hummingbirds feed in many small meals, consuming many small invertebrates and up to twelve times their own body weight in nectar each day. They spend an average of 10–15% of their time feeding and 75–80% sitting and digesting."  (Source 1)

Video of hummingbird hovering, slowed down (Source 2).

Scientists did a study to find out how hummingbirds can feed on nectar during a heavy rainstorm.  In this video clip, it shows how the hummingbird deals with more and more rainfall.  They found that the bird changes the position of its body, so it's almost horizontal, which helped to diminish the impact of the raindrops on the wings (Source 3). VIDEO TIP: click on the small movie to enlarge.

The violet sabrewing hummingbird, native to Mexico and Central America (Source 5).




Bibliography
1. "Hummingbird" Wikipedia article.  Wikipedia, 2012.  WWW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hummingbird.

2. "Time Warp: Hummingbird" YouTube video, uploaded by DiscoveryNetworks, 2009. WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8vjYTXgIJw.

3.  "Video: How Hummingbirds Weather the Storm" by Nicholas Fleur, 2012.  American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) magazine.  WWW: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/07/video-how-hummingbirds-weather-t.html?ref=hp.

4. "Ruby-throated Hummingbirds Return" blog post by Mary Holland, 2011.  WWW: http://naturallycuriouswithmaryholland.wordpress.com/2011/05/07/ruby-throated-hummingbirds-return/.

5. "Violet Sabrewing Hummingbird" photograph in a blog post in Flight Log by Corbett, 2009.  WWW: http://jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/costa_rica_animals_04/monteverde/violet_sabrewing_male.jpg.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Only metal liquid at room temp?

(Image of pound coin floating in mercury.  Source 2)

The only metal that is liquid at room temperature is mercury, a.k.a. quicksilver, Hg, or hydragyrum (meaning "liquid silver" in Latin) (Source 1).


But...why?

"The reason mercury manages to be a liquid at room temperature is 

because its bonding structure is weaker 
than that of most metals. The electrons that spin around mercury nuclei don't easily maintain linkages with other mercury atoms at standard temperatures, hence the lack of solidity [source: Senese]. Mercury is also something of an oddity for another reason, considering where it sits on the periodic table: The elements around it are much better at conducting heat and electricity.
Its liquid form makes mercury is a very versatile element, however. It conducts electricity and is used in switches, and it's also in barometers and thermometers. It can also be combined with a variety of other metals. Mercury on its own is poisonous, and when combined with other elements, it can form different compounds, which are used in everything from antiseptics and pesticides to batteries, fluorescent lamps and detonators for explosives [source: Jefferson Lab]."    (Source 1)

When mercury contacts aluminum, it disintegrates it.  (Source 3)

Because of this, mercury, like in thermometers, is not allowed on airplanes:

"Due to the reactivity of aluminium amalgam, restrictions are placed on the use and handling of mercury in proximity with aluminium. In particular, large amounts of mercury are not allowed aboard aircraft under most circumstances because of the risk of it forming amalgam with exposed aluminium parts in the aircraft.[4] In the Second World War, mercury may have been used to sabotage aircraft.[5] Accidental mercury spills in aircraft do sometimes result in insurance write-offs.[6]"  (Source 4)


Bibliography


1. "Why is mercury considered a metal but it's liquid at room temperature?" Discovery Channel Answer, 2011.  WWW: http://curiosity.discovery.com/question/mercury-metal-and-liquid.


2. "Mercury" blog post by antonii.  Glogster, 2012.  WWW: http://www.glogster.com/antonii/mercury/g-6mmkkqv0cnvq4oc68g6iua0?old_view=True.


3. "Mercury attacks Aluminum" YouTube video by periodictabledotcom.  Uploaded 2009.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwrel&v=Z7Ilxsu-JlY&NR=1.


4. "Aluminum amalgam" article by Wikipedia, 2012.  WWW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_amalgam.

Monday, July 16, 2012

What if your cells never died?

If the cells in your body weren't programmed to die when they reached their limit, and so that there is room for the new cells, how much would you weigh?

"Cell death is an absolute requirement, not only for life, but for developmental processes to proceed in a normal fashion.  If our cells didn't die over a lifetime, and we kept all of them, and didn't lose them, then we would weigh as much as 50 million metric tons" (Source 1)

holy crap...

how big is that, anyway?

50,000,000 metric tons = 50,000,000,000 kilograms or 50 billion kg

= 5 E10 kg or 5 x 10^10
(Source 3)


To put this in perspective, the mass of the Earth is 5.972E24 kg or 5.972 x 10^24 or 


5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg.
 (Source 2)


(Source 4)

Hmm OK that does the opposite of putting it into perspective, but at least you know your total cell mass is a lot less than the Earth!

Bibliography


1. "National Geographic: Moment of Death" TV documentary, 2008.  Viewed via Netflix.  WWW: http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/National_Geographic_Moment_of_Death/70146676?trkid=4530065.

2. "Earth" Wikipedia article, 2012.  WWW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth.

3. "Torr" image, InvisionFree, 2005.  WWW: http://s8.invisionfree.com/Superdickery_Forum/ar/t988.htm.

4. "Ant Lifting Heavy Earth" image, 2012.  http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-images-ant-lifting-heavy-earth-concept-power-strength-image14735039.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Animal with best eyesight?

that would be....


...not a potato

...not a peregrine falcon

...not a sight hound, but

this guy:

(Source 1)



(Source 1)

(Source 1)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~the Mantis Shrimp~~~~~


How many cones? is the question to ask when finding out who has the best vision.  For comparison...


Dogs - 2 cones (they can't see red)
Humans - 3 cones
Butterflies - 5-6 cones (they can see ultraviolet that we can't see)
Mantis Shrimp - 16 cones!  This is the most complicated visual system of any animal we know by 50% (Source 2).


More about these crustaceans...


"Mantis shrimp possess the animal kingdom’s most complicated eyes, capable of distinguishing between 100,000 colors — 10 times as many as humans and seeing circular polarized light, or CPL, which can’t be detected by any other creature [Wired.com]. Circular polarized light is one of two forms of polarized light, or light waves that travel in a specific plane. 


[...]  


The mantis shrimp is one of the few animals that reflects circular polarized light off its skin; since other shrimp can see that reflected light, it serves a communication function.  Says lead researcher Justin Marshall: “They’re talking to each other with a secret light channel”." (Source 3)


So maybe they have amazing eyes because the better their eyes are, the better they can interpret the skin light-show-communication of their fellow shrimp, so it's evolutionarily advantageous for them to have these sharp eyes.


For instance, say if Bobby Shrimp flashes blue tailfin, which means in shrimp - Look out! Giant octopus!, then Shirley Shrimp has a better chance of surviving if she can understand this quickly and respond with her eagle shrimpy eyes, but Amanda Shrimp perishes because her eyes only see 90,000 colors instead of 100,000.


(Source 3)

(Source 4)

Bibliography:


1. "Mantis Shrimp Amazing Beautiful" blog post by x. PlanetAnimalZone, 2011-12.  WWW: http://planetanimalzone.blogspot.com/2012/05/mantis-shrimp-amazing-beautiful.html.


2. "Colors" radio podcast by RadioLab.org.  Originally broadcast May 2012.  RadioLab, WNYC Radio, 2012.  WWW: http://www.radiolab.org/2012/may/21/.


3. "Shrimp Eyes Polarize Light Just Like a DVD Player, Only Better" article by Will Ramos.  Posted 2009. Consortium for Ocean Leadership, 2007-11.  WWW: http://www.oceanleadership.org/2009/shrimp-eyes-polarize-light-just-like-a-dvd-player-only-better/.


4. "Mantis Shrimp Eyes - The Coolest High-Def Devices Nature Has to Offer" YouTube video posted by trustusonline, 2011.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTF4PBb0h9g.

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Pea soup? Not today - pea black hole, please.

(Source 2)

How much would you have to crush the Earth to make it into a black hole?

Answer: You would have to crush the Earth from its diameter of 8,000 miles to the size of a pea.  This shows how dense matter has to be to form a black hole.


(Source 3)

Bibliography


1. "Season 1: Episode 3: The Story of Everything," "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking." Discovery Channel documentary miniseries.  Broadcast, 2010. Viewed via Netflix.  WWW: http://movies.netflix.com/WiPlayer?movieid=70209127&trkid=8362301&t=Into+the+Universe%3A+The+Story+of+Everything.


2. "Search for Black Holes" blog post by AstroBlob.  Posted 2010.  WWW: http://astroblob.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post.html.


3. "I thought this cake came out awfully dense" by Betsy Streeter.  "Sponge Cake Cartoons and Comics" webpage.  CSL CartoonStock, 2012.  WWW: http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/s/sponge_cake.asp.

Friday, July 13, 2012

How old is our galaxy?



"Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is thought to be one of the oldest, having started to assemble itself some 13 billion years ago." (Source 1)

To put that into perspective, the Big Bang, the start of our universe, happened 13.7 billion years ago.


(Source 2)

Bibliography


1. "Season 1: Episode 3: The Story of Everything," "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking." Discovery Channel documentary miniseries.  Broadcast, 2010. Viewed via Netflix.  WWW: http://movies.netflix.com/WiPlayer?movieid=70209127&trkid=8362301&t=Into+the+Universe%3A+The+Story+of+Everything


2. "The "Milky Way"...and Our Galactic Neighborhood" webpage.  WWW: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/universo/cosmos15.htm.

Thursday, July 12, 2012

How to Time Travel

(Source 4)

H

aving just watched Stephen Hawkings' "Into the Universe" miniseries, I am very excited about aliens and time travel and things that are vastly improbable but exist anyway, like life on this planet, for instance!  So I thought I would summarize Episode 2: "Time Travel" in this series before it dribbles out of my head and becomes abstract again (Source 1).  Hawkings said the option described in #1 is the most practical, probable way he has thought of up till now...


1. Build a fast train that could circle the Earth 7 times per second.  Thus the train would approach but not exceed the speed of light (because exceeding the speed of light is impossible).  Put passengers on that train and have it race around the Earth at the speed of 7 circles around the earth/second for one week.  The passengers would exit the train after one week of riding it, 100 years later.  This is because the laws of the universe slow down time inside the train because it is going so fast, to make sure nothing in the train exceeds the natural speed limit of the universe, which is the speed of light.

This would allow for forward time travel, into the future, but not for backward time travel into the past because backward time travel creates a paradox of, well, why can't you shoot your grandfather or your past self?  If you did, who would shoot you? Did you create a clone out of thin air?  And you can't have the effect of the death without the cause of you shooting yourself first, so you're reversing the logic of cause before effect.  So that's a paradox and the universe and its laws can't allow it, or the laws of physics would, like, explode.

Side note - so Superman zooming around the world to turn back time is actually almost good science?  Cool!  Except he could only fly around it to go into the future, not the past, because of the paradox issue.  Also only he would time travel, not the people on the earth because they're not approaching the speed of light, only he is.
(Source 5)
(Source 2)

Problems: Cost, technology.  International cooperation to build a train that circles the whole Earth.  How to choose who would get to ride this train?  By money, merit, or heartfelt story?


2.  Take a spaceship to the most massive thing in our Milky Way Galaxy, which is the black hole at the center of our galaxy.  Time slows down when you are near something with large mass.  Illustration: Imagine time is a flowing river, and you are a tiny person standing on a ball that is floating in that river.  The ball is the Earth, or if you were orbitting a black hole, the black hole.  Like a heavy ball in a flowing river, the  heavier the ball is, the slower it will flow along with the current.


Have the spaceship with people in it orbit the black hole, and not get sucked in by travelling at a fast enough speed and aiming the ship right at the edge of the black hole.  The spaceship, monitored from Earth will be observed there as making one orbit in 16 minutes.  however, onboard the ship it will only take 8 minutes because near the massive object, the black hole, time has slowed down.  So if they orbited for 5 years, the people on Earth would have aged 10 years while the ones in the spaceship only aged 5.

Problems: You're only going half the speed of Earth time, so it's not that fast.  Black holes--it's hard not to get sucked in.  Also our galaxy's black hole is really far away.  Cost, technology to travel that far and also to know exactly how to make the spaceship orbit the black hole without being drawn into it.
(Source 3)

3.  Wormholes are tiny holes in the fabric of time, which have been observed at the quantum physics level (smaller than an atom).  If somehow scientists could enlarge them so that a human or spaceship could travel through them, hypothetically they could travel through time and possibly also space.  However they could not travel to the past because that would create a paradox.  In addition, a past-travelling wormhole would suck up radiation from the past and magnify it, like in the phenomenon of feedback, as seen with bad sound systems, and that would destroy it.  But maybe this could be used for travelling to the future?

Problems:  Cost, technology to enlarge a wormhole in the first place.

4. Build a large spaceship that can hold a lot of fuel and go very very fast.  Put some people in there, maybe some couples so they could have babies.  Start it up, head towards the edge of our galaxy.  It would take a while to get to full speed because it was so large, but once it gets near enough to the speed of light, time in the ship would slow down so that one day in the ship were 1 year on Earth.  In such a ship, we could reach the edge of our galaxy in 80 years.  We would be time travelling and also exploring the galaxy at the same time.  The couples on board could have babies, and that way the mission could go on and on, presumably until the fuel ran out.  Perhaps they could even try to refuel in space, if we could figure out how to use some element that is common in space as a fuel.  For instance, if we bump into a gaseous planet, we could use its gas, or if we can figure out how to harness solar energy, we could refuel by stopping by a powerful star and putting out some solar panels...


Issues: Cost, technology.  They wouldn't have any problem finding volunteers because I would sign up!


Bibliography:


1. "Season 1: Episode 2: Time Travel," "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking." Discovery Channel documentary miniseries.  Broadcast, 2010. Viewed via Netflix.  WWW: http://movies.netflix.com/WiPlayer?movieid=70211618&trkid=2361637&t=Into+the+Universe+with+Stephen+Hawking#MovieId=70211618&EpisodeMovieId=70209126.

2.  "Superman Science" blog post by Dan Piraro.  BIZARROBLOG, bizarrocomic.blogspot.com.  WWW: http://bizarrocomic.blogspot.com/2009/04/superman-science.html.

3. "Time Travel" blog post by who you calling a skeptic?.  Whoyoucallingaskeptic.wordpress.com.  WWW: http://whoyoucallingaskeptic.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/time-travel/.

4. "Scientists Recreate Evolution of Complexity Using 'Molecular Time Travel'" by Deskarati.  Deskarati.com, 2012.  WWW: http://deskarati.com/2012/01/08/scientists-recreate-evolution-of-complexity-using-molecular-time-travel/.

5. "Superman ANGRY" video by paulsof69.  YouTube.com, uploaded 2006.  WWW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCsHTNP2MaU.